Skip to main content

No evidence for God?

There's no evidence for God's existence.

This is a popular claim of atheists.

But no matter how you try to argue for evidence for God or supernaturalism, they don't accept it and keep claiming there is no evidence.

What to do?

Put them to provide evidence for their atheistic and naturalistic worldview.

See these articles:

How to Respond to a Supercilious Atheist.

Presumption of Atheism and the ‘Insufficient Evidence’ Objection to Belief in God.

Comments

Jime said…
I think there is evidence for God, but its interpretation and implications (regarding to the God debate) are philosophical, not scientific.

I agree with Antony Flew's recent comments (2007) on the type of evidence for God that he accepts: "It was empirical evidence, the evidence uncovered by the sciences. But it was a philosophical inference drawn from the evidence. Scientists as scientists cannot make these kinds of philosophical inferences. They have to speak as philosophers when they study the philosophical implications of empirical evidence"

http://www.tothesource.org/10_30_2007/10_30_2007.htm

You can draw a philosophical inference for God existence based upon scientific and empirical evidence. This point is important, because many atheists wrongly see God as "scientific hypothesis" to be tested in the laboratory, not as a philosophical inference from evidence.
February 19, 2008 at 1:28 PM
Ardegas said…
Good point, Jime.

Your blogs promises to be interesting.
February 21, 2008 at 10:41 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Santa Claus Argument

"There's no reason to believe in God" says the atheist, "there's no evidence of his existence". "But what is the evidence that God does not exist" replies the theist. "Sure you have faith that God does not exist". "I don't have to provide evidence that God does not exist more than the evidence I have to provide to show that Santa does not exist. If you are congruent and reject the existence of Santa you should also reject the existence of God. Where's the proof that Santa does not exist?” Such is a line of reasoning popular among atheists. I call it "the Santa Claus argument". It conveys the idea that God is a fiction character. But what is the basis of this idea? It seems to be based in the idea that God does not exist. But if this is the case, this argument (sic) is question begging, because this is precisely the issue at stake. Some atheists seem to imply that God does not exist because the concept of God is a hu...
23 comments
Read more

Ten reasons why God is different than Santa Claus

Santa is an intentional fiction. God is seriously believed to exist. Santa's existence is irrelevant for the universe's existence, but if God exists she is the foundation of all existence. Santa is a contingent being, he could or not exist. If God exists, she is necessary, she could not not exist. Santa's existence is falsifiable. God's existence is not. God's existence is an issue of serious reflection for unbelievers. Santa's is not. Many famous people of high intellectual caliber believe in God. There's no serious intellectual known for her belief in Santa. There are different kind of arguments that seriously pretend to support the case for God's existence. No such arguments exist for Santa. God's invisible and inmaterial. Santa is not. Belief in God is a basic tenet of many religious organizations. There is no organization known to defend belief in Santa. There is no philosophical basis for belief in Santa, but there is for God. See also: The inv...
3 comments
Read more

Defining Atheism

There is no agreement about the definition of atheism, not even in those who call themselves atheists. Some authors say that atheism is denial of God. That is the most popular definition among non-atheists, and is often contrasted to agnosticism. Others say that atheism is lack of belief in God, and that this lack of belief doesn't necessarily imply denial of the existence of God. This is the definition that is most used by internet atheists, and is used to effectively avoid the burden of the proof. These atheists say they don't have to prove the non existence of God. Those who claim that God exists are the ones obliged to prove that God exists, no the other way around. They elevate this to a general epistemological principle. This definition of atheism as a lack of belief allows the atheist to appear neutral and ingenuous about the issue of God, without the need to call themselves "agnostics", label that is despised by atheists for being too weak. In order to disting...
3 comments
Read more